Montréal Contre-information
Montréal Contre-information
Montréal Contre-information

Migrant Prison: Nighttime Sabotage at Lemay Company Headquarters

 Comments Off on Migrant Prison: Nighttime Sabotage at Lemay Company Headquarters
Apr 182019
 

Anonymous submission to MTL Counter-info

On the night of April 14th, we paid a visit to Lemay’s headquarters in St. Henri to make a contribution to the struggle against the construction of a proposed new migrant prison, set to open in 2021 in Laval, QC. Lemay is a major architecture firm involved in designing the prison. We shut off access to the building by gluing all the locks, smashing the electronic sensors that permit access to the building by key cards, and u-locking door handles together at multiple entrances. The garage doors were blocked by a combination of spike strips and smoke bombs, which were rigged to go off if the garage doors opened. We assume that employees and company clients had a hard time accessing the building the next day, and hope they will continue to feel the effects of escalating actions against them and others involved in the project.

We want to stop this prison from happening. We want to undo the institutions of exclusion, confinement, and surveillance that uphold white supremacy and capitalism, and send our solidarity to all those struggling against the violence they depend on.

Let’s shut it all down.

No borders, no prisons.

Rage for Lucy: Bring Her Back! No More Detentions and Deportations!

 Comments Off on Rage for Lucy: Bring Her Back! No More Detentions and Deportations!
Apr 172019
 

From Solidarity Across Borders

One year after the deportation of Lucy Granados, Montreal community gathers to denounce racist and colonial immigration system and demand her return.

Photos here!

On April 13th, friends and supporters of Lucy Francineth Granados marked the one-year anniversary of her deportation with a rally at the Laval Immigration Detention Centre. One year ago, they had gathered in the same location in an attempt to physically block her deportation.

Lucy Francineth Granados lived in Montreal from 2009 to 2018. In March 2018, she was violently arrested at her home by four CBSA officers. She spent 24 nights in the migrant prison before being deported, still injured from the CBSA attack. To date, she has not received an answer to her application for permanent residence on humanitarian and compassionate grounds- if it is accepted, she could return. She is in daily contact with her friends in Canada, and the campaign to bring her home continues.

With chants of “Bring Lucy Back,” “Solidarité avec les sans papiers,” “No borders, no prisons, stop the deportations!” and “Migrant Prison? Shut it down!” the colourful crowd redecorated the fence around the detention centre with silhouettes of Lucy and other detained and deported community members, banners, flowers, and clothing, to represent migrants like Lucy who defy borders around the world in search of safety for themselves and their children.

“We are gathered to show that, despite the violence of colonial borders, Lucy is still a dear member of our community,” said Bill from Solidarity Across Borders. “We have not stopped and we will not stop working to bring her back to her home,” he added.

The group was prevented by a heavy police presence from going to the back of the detention centre, where Lucy had been forced by CBSA through several fences into a waiting convoy. In sharp contrast to the armed force beside them and the cruelty of prisons, supporters sent powerful messages of solidarity and love over the prison walls. Carmelo, from the Mexicans United for Regularization (MUR), and Jihad, from Solidarity Across Borders, both of whom spent time in the migrant prison, courageously denounced the violence of Canada’s immigration system and demanded Lucy’s return. Lucy also addressed the crowd by phone, speaking movingly of her struggle and expressing gratitude for the ongoing support of her many friends.

The group then marched to the planned site of the new migrant prison, where Amy from Solidarity Across Borders shared information about the new prison and the important campaign to stop it from being built. Slated to become operational in 2021, the new migrant prison represents an investment into the state’s continued capacity to detain and deport migrants like Lucy. Construction has not yet begun, beyond a large pit dug at one end of the site. Supporters threw seed bombs, in a symbolic act of defiance that aimed to reclaim the site and to prepare the muddy grounds for better uses.

Idil from Solidarity Across Borders wrapped up with a powerful speech, beginning with Home by poet Warsan Shire, and concluding, “They can dress this project up as nicely as they want but those of us here see it for what it is and it is our responsibility to make sure we let as many others as we can know as well. It is our responsibility to push back against this project, to fight, and to ensure that it never sees the light of day.”

More context about Lucy’s campaign: www.solidarityacrossborders.org/en/bring-lucy-back-the-campaign-to-support-lucy-granados-continues

More about the new prison: www.stopponslaprison.info

Doxxing the Canadian Border Services Agency

 Comments Off on Doxxing the Canadian Border Services Agency
Apr 132019
 

Anonymous submission to MTL Counter-info

Like ICE in the United States, the Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) operates a deportation force, tearing migrants away from their friends and loved ones on a daily basis in the name of a colonial nation-state’s rule of law. Though brutal and well organized, this immigration enforcement system is not a faceless machine. The agents who carry out its vital functions have names and addresses, which is what concerns us today. Well, their names at least.

In advance of this year’s No Borders May Day, below you will find the name of every member of the Enforcement and Intelligence Division of the Quebec Operations Branch of the CBSA, categorized by job title. This information comes from the response to an access-to-information request that was published by the Twitter account @cdnati, to which we are unrelated. Those documents, linked here, contain the names of all CBSA employees across Canada. The organizational charts drawn from below are dated November 2017.

We hope this information serves as a resource for a diversity of projects opposing border enforcement. Whether a particular ‘Inland Enforcement Officer’ or ‘Intelligence Analyst’ is an active white supremacist, doesn’t think much about politics and believes it’s a job like any other, or feels shame and remorse about their work, their continued activity in the CBSA puts migrants and migrants’ communities at risk.

It should come as no surprise that people will identify these agents and make it clear that their role in a violently racist and colonial system won’t be tolerated.

Love & rage,

anarchists

Investigations & Removals

Inland Enforcement Supervisors
  1. Cathy Chan
  2. Shawn Erridge
  3. Eric Gagnon
  4. Daniel Godin
  5. Genevieve Gratton
  6. Tonina Iermieri
  7. Leon Kabongo Katalay
  8. Roberto Mancini
  9. Audrey Sawyer
  10. Louise Starnino
  11. Valerie Surpris
  12. Miruna Vasilescu
Inland Enforcement Officers
  1. Karine Amato
  2. Francis Bard
  3. Catherine Barthelemy
  4. Reed Barthelemy
  5. Carole Bergeron
  6. Josée Blackburn
  7. Karine Blackburn
  8. Daisy-Ivy Bode
  9. Daniel Bordeleau
  10. Daniel Eduardo Borja Torres
  11. Stéphane Boudreau
  12. Mina Boukdjadja
  13. David Bowles
  14. Maryse Breault
  15. Dominic Brisebois
  16. Valeriano Cassetta
  17. Roger Casseus
  18. Benoit Chausse
  19. Jean-Luc Day
  20. Mathieu Dépatie
  21. Steven Derick
  22. Patrick Desjardins
  23. Daniel Deslauriers
  24. Josiane Desnoyers Gaulin
  25. David Dickson
  26. Antoine Doyon
  27. Alexandre Duchaine
  28. Luc Ferlatte
  29. Dominique Fillion
  30. Sébastien Fortin
  31. Michel Gagnon
  32. Patricia Garofano
  33. Nicolas Geoffroy
  34. David Ghilarducci
  35. Vincenzo Giobbi
  36. Nicolas Girard
  37. Matthew Goodsell
  38. Nadine Gregoire
  39. Penelope Gutierrez
  40. Simon Halle
  41. Josée Hogue
  42. Alexandre Horvath Callender
  43. Goulnara Iskakova
  44. Pascal Jacques
  45. Nadia Jarwa
  46. Jeff Jean Baptiste
  47. Isabelle Joseph
  48. Tarrah Khan
  49. Henry Kwan
  50. Eric Lacombe
  51. Eric Lafreniere
  52. David Laroche
  53. Francois Légaré
  54. Normand Lesperance
  55. Louis Lessard
  56. Francis Letellier
  57. Liette Malenfant
  58. Nancy Marois
  59. Jessica Martin
  60. Véronique Massignani
  61. Adlane Merioud
  62. Caroline Messier
  63. Martin Meunier
  64. Josée Moreau
  65. Matthieu Ouellon
  66. Alfred Pichard
  67. Roberto Raschella
  68. Nadine Sarette
  69. Esther St-Onge
  70. Aristophanes Tsiampouras
  71. Edith Turcotte
  72. Kari Warren
  73. Chrisandra Watson
Enforcement Case Officers
  1. Chantal Bissonnette
  2. Stéphanie Bousquet
  3. Catherine Chilakos
  4. Natacha Da Silva
  5. Bruno Estebeteguy
  6. Snejinka Koen
  7. Marie-Claude Turgeon
  8. Isabelle Valade
  9. Dominik Verville
Immigration Advisors
  1. Sandrine Chapados
  2. Linda Coulombe
  3. Nathalie Daoust
  4. Julie Plouffe
Investigation Assistants
  1. Nadine Behnam
  2. Lyne Bellisario

Intelligence

Regional Programs Managers
  1. Gabriel Duteau
  2. Adriano Giannini
  3. Jimmy Giguere
  4. Nicolas Légaré
  5. Silvain Loiselle
  6. Khalid Meniai
  7. Danielle Pouliot
Intelligence Officers
  1. Harinder Bhangoo
  2. Julie Charette
  3. Francois Comeau
  4. Chantal Coulombe
  5. Pierre Fortier
  6. Daniel Gariepy
  7. Serge Goneau
  8. Melanie Granger Meunier
  9. Justin Hawkins
  10. Denis Hetu
  11. Ann Joly
  12. Jeanne L Heureux
  13. Mathieu Lachance
  14. Suzanne Laferriere
  15. Richard Lamoureux
  16. Lyne Landry
  17. André Latour
  18. Lucie Leblanc
  19. Robert Leduc
  20. Silvain Loiselle
  21. Benoit Marchand
  22. Eric Martineau
  23. Hugo Morissette
  24. Eve Morrier
  25. Karine O’Connor
  26. Jeremy Pearce
  27. Sébastien Pelletier
  28. Martin Prud Homme
  29. Yannick Riopel
  30. Jessica Robichaud
  31. Louis Sanson
  32. Mark Solomon
  33. Mario St Denis
  34. Marcel Theberge
  35. Roberto Villa
Intelligence Analysts
  1. Anna Biello
  2. Marie-Julie Bouffard
  3. Manon Brunet
  4. Karine Caron
  5. Francois Chamberland
  6. Marie-Josee Delorme
  7. André Desgreniers
  8. Charles Dudemaine
  9. Nelson Guay
  10. Frédéric Letarte
  11. Barbara Martel
  12. Linda Ouellet
  13. Jean-Francois Pinard
  14. Scott Ramaglia-Mega
  15. Julie Roy
Intelligence Researchers
  1. Kenneth Alarcon Vilchez
  2. Éric Coutu
  3. Victoria Do Rosario
  4. Lucia Graziani
  5. Sylvie Grégoire-Trudel
  6. Hicham Kahwaji
  7. Sebastien Lavergne
  8. Mélanie Nizza
  9. Nancy Racine
Intelligence Clerks
  1. Denise Lecavalier
  2. Dimitri Levin
  3. Maria Paula Manzanares

Hearings & Detentions

Regional Programs Managers
  1. Melanie Gosselin
  2. Isabelle Trottier
  3. Sandra Guilmette
  4. Lyne Campbell
Hearings Officers
  1. Lisa Abraham
  2. Josee Barrette
  3. Jean-Claude Bastien
  4. Jean-Christophe Berthold
  5. Josée Blackburn
  6. Chantal Boucher
  7. Myriam Paris Boukdjadja
  8. Maude Brais
  9. Maxime Brodeur
  10. Daphnee Clement
  11. Lucie Cliche
  12. Ariane Cohen
  13. Salvatore D’Aloia
  14. Jean-Francois David
  15. Miriam Ettinger
  16. G Guerrier
  17. Phoebee Jean-Pierre
  18. Sylvie Lacaille
  19. Marie-France Lambert
  20. Alexandre Lampron
  21. Anthony Lashley
  22. Melanie Leduc
  23. Farah Merali
  24. Mike Milette
  25. Valery Naamo
  26. Sonia Parsakhian
  27. Lyzann Penwarm
  28. Jessica Plourde
  29. Isabelle Poulin
  30. Zofia Przybytkowski
  31. Nadine Saadé
  32. J-D Saint-Pierre
  33. Karine Santerre
  34. Chantal Sarrazin
  35. Léa Adrienne Spigelski
  36. Gabriele Spina
  37. Ludmilla St Sauveur
  38. Ewa Staszewicz
  39. Anne-Renée Touchette
Hearings Assistants
  1. Marylyn Andrada
  2. Beverly Beauchamp
  3. David Bouchard
  4. Fanta Camara
  5. Ketly Castel
  6. Mario Chabot
  7. Marthe Contre
  8. Anica Felicin
  9. France Fortin
  10. Diane Francoeur
  11. Daniel Hurtubise
  12. Jenneil Ifill
  13. Margaret Jones
  14. B Lebel
  15. Arnold Ng
  16. Arnaud Normand
  17. N Okbi
  18. Linda Pelletier
  19. Line Piche
  20. Sebastien Plourde
  21. Sébastien Roy
  22. Sabrina Soria
  23. Peggy Pik Wah Woo
Hearings Advisors
  1. Naomi Alfred
  2. Krystel Baaklini
  3. Nathalie Belanger
  4. Nada Berechid
  5. Brigitte Bilodeau
  6. Josée Cholette
  7. Michèle-Andrée Cromp
  8. Stéphanie Doiron
  9. Josiane Gauthier
  10. Nathalie Guillaume
  11. Natacha Jankovics
  12. Johanne Laforce
  13. Marie Chantal Laroche
  14. Patricia Papanagiotou
  15. Martin Rémillard
  16. Sylvie Roy
  17. Nathalie Sabourin
  18. Yan Ste Croix
  19. Michèle Théroux
  20. Lien Danielle Tremblay
  21. Alain Vadeboncoeur

Criminal Investigations

Regional Programs Managers
  1. Genevieve Cogne
  2. Hathia Brillon
  3. Peter Storr
  4. Éric Béliveau
  5. Sébastien Foisy (Montréal)
Investigators (** = Montreal)
  1. Eric Allard
  2. M Aubry
  3. Annie Aubut
  4. Claude Beausejour
  5. Calvin Bedros
  6. Patrycja Brones
  7. Jean-Francois Carrier
  8. Shirley Cavanagh**
  9. Sandra Chaillou
  10. Christina Chiechi**
  11. Daniel Cote
  12. Jeremie Dion
  13. Marie-Josee Dionne
  14. Tony Dos Santos
  15. Stéphane-Patrick Dubuc
  16. Caroline Faille**
  17. Estelle Forget
  18. John Gagnon**
  19. Claudine Gariépy
  20. Sabrina Gauthier**
  21. Francois Julien Girard
  22. David Giroux
  23. Stéphane Guitard**
  24. Isabelle Jamison
  25. Alexandre Lefebvre
  26. Christine Levac
  27. Danielle Masson
  28. Edmund James Mclaughlin**
  29. Anthony Mercier
  30. Veronique Moreau
  31. Jocelyn Nadeau-Lapensée
  32. Patrick O Neill
  33. Sylvie Paquette
  34. Marie France Parent**
  35. Richard Patenaude
  36. Martin Pelletier**
  37. Michele Proulx
  38. Guy Ratte
  39. Philippe Recupero
  40. V Sabourin
  41. Mariejosee Simard**
  42. Stephanie St Pierre
  43. Nathalie Surprenant**
  44. Sylvie Thibeault**
  45. Pascale Trachy
  46. Isabelle Trinque
  47. Brigitte Watkins
Investigation Support Clerks
  1. Denise Boivin
  2. S Bombardier
  3. Adela Lemus
  4. G-V Revatta
  5. Nathalie Roy

Leadership*

Director

Annie Beausejour

Assistant Directors
  1. Éric Caron (Criminal Investigations)
  2. Christine Groleau (Hearings & Detentions)
  3. Maurizio Mannarino (Investigations & Removals)
  4. Alain Surprenant (Intelligence)

* These names are mostly already publicly available.

Miscellaneous

C & I Services Assistants
  1. Masha Abdulhaq
  2. Jean-Francois Aubé
  3. Neelam Bansal
  4. Alexandre Baril
  5. Sébastien Bois
  6. Valérie Brodeur
  7. Valérie Brunet
  8. Sophie Cauchon
  9. Diane Colella
  10. Myriame Denis Charles
  11. Alain Desgagné
  12. Annie Francoeur
  13. Mirlène Gilles
  14. Marie Guenette
  15. Deborah Loverso
  16. Giovanna Marigliano
  17. A Mastrogiacomo
  18. Cong Minh Nguyen
  19. Benjamin Nicolas
  20. Daniel Nobert
  21. Julie Pilon
  22. Caroline Veillette
  23. Jocelyne Yeon
Office Assistants/Administrative Assistants/Administrative Officers
  1. Sophie Archambault
  2. Julie Bois
  3. Francine Bres
  4. Judith Gosselin
  5. Céline Grégoire
  6. Diane Hachey
  7. Assunta Iasenzaniro
  8. Pauline Paradis
  9. Émilie Pélissier
  10. Diane Perron
  11. Lise Régnier
General Duty Clerk
  1. Robert Leblanc

Sodexo Attacked

 Comments Off on Sodexo Attacked
Apr 012019
 
Suzanne Bergeron, présidente de Sodexo Canada

Suzanne Bergeron, president of Sodexo Canada

Anonymous submission to MTL Counter-info

In the early morning of March 29th, the president of Sodexo Canada was visited at her home in Brossard. All the tires of the two cars in her driveway were slashed, their windshields were smashed in, and FUCK SODEXO and (A) were written on their hoods.

Sodexo profits from imprisonment around the world. They offer among other things management services for private prisons and migrant detention centers, and cafeteria services for prisons.

In Canada more specifically, they profit from the extractive economy by offering security and cafeteria services for extraction sites.

This action is in solidarity with anarchist prisoners everywhere.

Prison profiteers must not sleep peacefully. The companies considering taking contracts for the construction of the new migrant prison in Laval should think twice.

Migrant Prison: Attacks on Lemay Condo Developments

 Comments Off on Migrant Prison: Attacks on Lemay Condo Developments
Mar 262019
 

Anonymous submission to MTL Counter-info

On the night of March 19th, the sales office of Humaniti had its windows smashed and two Lowney towers were redecorated using paint-filled fire extinguishers. What do these condo developments have in common? They were both designed by the Lemay architecture firm, which is helping to build a new migrant prison in Laval, Quebec.

Why not disturb the peace and quiet of the citizens occupying these luxury condos, whose wealth and comfort are founded upon the dispossession, exploitation, and imprisonment of those who have been here since before the colonization of this continent, those newcomers seeking a better life, survival, or pushed here by empire, and everyone who resists the prevailing order?

Lemay, we hope you enjoy informing your future potential clients that their projects will be sabotaged if they hire you. Should you choose not to inform them, we will enjoy giving them a costly surprise.

To all those struggling against borders in so-called Quebec and Canada: let us relentlessly attack the companies and agencies involved in any way in the construction of this migrant prison, so that it can’t be built!

Fire to the prisons! Sabotage borders, their enforcers, and collaborators!

Stop The Prison, Open The Border

 Comments Off on Stop The Prison, Open The Border
Mar 152019
 

From From Embers

This week’s episode features two interviews with people involved in the struggle to stop a new migrant prison from being built in Laval, Quebec. Topics discussed include:

-the project and how the government is trying to frame it as a “nice” cage.

-senses of strategy and what might work to actually stop a project like this.

-actions that have taken place against the prison, how they’ve gone, and what actions might be on the horizon.

Stop The Prison

Ni Frontières, Ni Prisons (facebook link!)

Solidarity Across Borders

General Contractors: Don’t bid to build a migrant prison!

 Comments Off on General Contractors: Don’t bid to build a migrant prison!
Mar 012019
 

Anonymous submission to MTL Counter-info

BACKGROUND

The Canadian government is attempting to construct a new migrant prison in Laval, QC. The building, set to be built by 2021, would hold 158 people, including children, increasing the government’s capacity to control and deport migrants in a context of rising xenophobia and racism across Canada and in Quebec specifically. Though the prison is being billed as “more humane” than the current detention centre, it’s clear that aesthetic improvements will not stop this from being a prison: it will still rip people from their families and communities and be an integral part of the deportation machine.

The land at the site of the proposed new migrant prison has been readied for construction, and the bidding process for the General Contractor has begun. On February 20th, a group of people shut down a planned visit to the construction site for interested companies. They talked to company representatives about the nature of the project and why they should not participate in building this prison. Many companies are unfortunately still bidding for the contract.

Let’s show these companies that there is widespread disapproval for this project, and that there will be resistance if construction begins! WE HAVE UNTIL MARCH 20TH, the deadline for bids, to get these companies to pull out of the process.

WHAT YOU CAN DO

Individuals

Join the campaign to let these companies know that what they’re doing is reprehensible! Get together with friends and family, send some emails, make some calls, or send some faxes between now and MARCH 20TH.

Free faxes can be sent using any of the following websites:
https://www.gotfreefax.com
https://faxzero.com

When you get in touch with these companies, here’s a sample script you can draw on if you want:

Hello,

I’m [calling/e-mailing] you today to tell you that you should drop your bid for the Laval immigrant detention centre. It’s a morally reprehensible project, and it faces widespread opposition –  being involved with it will reflect badly on your company. It’s designed to imprison and deport people who are trying to immigrate here, and it will rip apart families and violently take people out of their communities. That’s part of a racist approach to migration on the part of Canada that we need to challenge rather than support. It’s not something I stand for, and I’m far from alone in that position. Make the right choice and drop your bid for this project.

Groups

If you’re a community organization or activist group, sign up to host a call-in day!

We encourage you to ask your members to call/e-mail/fax on a day that you choose. Invite people to your space to make calls & send e-mails and faxes together!

With many groups signing up, we can have continued engagement with these companies over the month.

Your organization or group can sign up for a particular day using this calendar, and we’ll get in touch over email to see how we can help spread the word: https://framadate.org/rxAzKaJGOlXJkGzx

THE COMPANIES

These companies want to build a new migrant prison in Laval. Contact them to tell them to drop out of the bidding process!

1.

COMPANY: Corporation de construction Germano
REPRESENTATIVE NAME: Richard A. Germano
TITLE: Président
EMAIL: info@germanoconstruction.com
PHONE: 450 668-7807
FAX: 450 668-5002

2.

COMPANY: Construction SOCAM ltée
REPRESENTATIVE NAME: Richard Paradis
TITLE: Estimateur Senior
EMAIL: r.paradis@socam.ca
PHONE: 450 662-9000 #223 or 450 662-9000
FAX: 450 662-9838

3.

COMPANY: Groupe Geyser
REPRESENTATIVE NAME: Lina Tremblay
TITLE: Estimateur
EMAIL: ltremblay@groupegeyser.com
PHONE: 450 625-2003
FAX: 450 625-2883

4.

COMPANY: Tisseur Inc.
REPRESENTATIVE NAME: Jacques Hosson
TITLE: Estimateur
EMAIL: estimation@constructiontisseur.ca
PHONE: 819 322-1523 #258
FAX: 819 322-6766

5.

COMPANY: Construction CYBCO
EMAIL: info@cybco.ca
PHONE: 514 284-2228

6.

COMPANY: VCI Contrôles inc.
REPRESENTATIVE NAME: Joseph Jacob
TITLE: Chargé de projet
EMAIL: jjacob@vcicontrols.ca, pcraig@vcicontrols
PHONE: 450 442-3555 poste 101
FAX: 450 442-3337

7.

COMPANY: Bruneau électrique Inc.
EMAIL: info@bruneauelectrique.com
PHONE: 514 353-4343, 450 759-6606
Fax: 450 759-2653

8.

COMPANY: Standard Building Contractors
REPRESENTATIVE NAME: Shane Ross
TITLE: President
EMAIL: shane@standard.builders
PHONE: 613 847-7258

9.

COMPANY: Securassure
REPRESENTATIVE NAME: Matthew Poplaw
TITLE: Sales
EMAIL: matthew@securassure.ca
PHONE: 514 373-3131
FAX: 1 855 439-9500

Migrant Prison: noise demo blocks site visit, and an update on implicated companies and the ongoing bidding period

 Comments Off on Migrant Prison: noise demo blocks site visit, and an update on implicated companies and the ongoing bidding period
Feb 212019
 

Anonymous submission to MTL Counter-info

Much of the ground may be covered in a thick sheet of ice right now, and piles of snow have been growing around the construction site for the new migrant prison in Laval for weeks, but that doesn’t mean the Canadian government isn’t hard at work preparing the next stages of construction for this monstrosity, nor that we should turn our attention away until after the spring thaw.

Early in February, it became public that the bidding period for the General Contractor contract had opened for the project, and that there would be a site visit held on February 20th at 10am for all interested bidders. So, early in the morning on February 20th, a group of people gathered to take a bus out to the construction site in Laval.

The group quickly made their way to the road leading to the security check-in for the bidders, and set up a picket, blocking the bidders’ vehicles from getting to the site. People there to pick up loved ones from the neighbouring prisons were welcomed through, and responded in kind with cheers and honks of support for the demo. Those present loudly communicated the deplorable nature of the prison project, and registered to all those considering working on it that there would be people standing in the way of the project at every stage.

People shouted, banged pots and pans, and blew on horns for over an hour, and had banners and signs against prisons and borders, as well as silhouette posters with the names of people deported in recent years. Company representatives present were personally called out, to let them know opponents of the project are aware of who they are. Some of the company representatives, sent by their bosses to attend the visit, expressed support for the demo following conversations with those in attendance. Over the course of an hour, most of the bidders had turned their cars around and left, accepting that they would not be allowed through. By 11am, an hour after the visit had been scheduled to begin, the group packed up their banners and left the area, leaving behind only a couple of cars – mostly Laval police.

With a month of bidding left, it’s time to assess what we know and what we can do next to disrupt the project. Read on for important updates on the state of the prison project, and newly public information about other companies involved.

What’s happened so far

Since the summer of 2017, Montreal based Lemay and Quebec City based Groupe A have been working on the architectural plans for the prison. In December 2018, Englobe Corporation and Excavation Loiselle completed their environmental remediation work on the sprawling CSC grounds that may become home to an additional prison on Montee St-Francois, already host to the current migrant prison, the minimum and medium federal men’s prisons, and the provincial Leclerc institution. For quite some time, the timeline for construction to begin in earnest on the project has been unclear.

On January 31, 2019, however, Public Works and Government Services Canada posted their call for tenders for who will be in charge of the largest chunk of work on the prison – the General Contractor. The documents provided to interested bidders provide important information about the next phases of work, and offer ideas about where to intervene.

The ongoing bidding period

January 31st marked day one of the six-week bidding period for the General Contractor position. Bidding will be open until March 20th, at which time the company with the lowest bid will get the contract.

During the bidding period, companies interested in bidding on the project are invited to post their information on the publicly available “List of interested suppliers”. On this list, accessible on the government buy and sell website, one can find the company name, contact person, email, and phone number for each company who publicly discloses their interest in the project, though some companies do not publicly state their interest using this list. Many more tried to attend the site visit on February 20th.

As of February 20th, the following information is available for six interested bidders. :

1. Contact Shane Ross, President
Company Standard Building Contractors
Email shane@standard.builders
Phone 6138477258

2. Contact Richard Paradis, Estimateur Senior
Company Construction SOCAM ltée
Email r.paradis@socam.ca
Phone 450-662-9000 #223

3. Contact Matthew Poplaw, Sales
Company Securassure
Email matthew@securassure.ca
Phone 5143733131

4. Contact Lina Tremblay, Estimateur
Company Groupe Geyser
Email ltremblay@groupegeyser.com
Phone 4506252003

5. Contact Richard A. Germano, Président
Company Corporation de construction Germano
Email info@germanoconstruction.com
Phone 450-668-7807

6. Contact Jacques Hosson, Estimateur
Company Tisseur Inc.
Email estimation@constructiontisseur.ca
Phone 8193221523 #258

Also present for the site visit were representatives of the following companies:

Company Bruneau électrique Inc.
Email info@bruneauelectrique.com
Phone 514 353-4343, 450 759-6606

Company Construction CYBCO
Email info@cybco.ca
Phone 514 284-2228

Whoever gets this contract, they will be involved in the project until the projected end of construction (the end of March, 2021). They will be responsible for subcontracting out smaller parts of the construction work – these contracts will likely not be made public.

Other companies involved in the project

Included in the documents released with the call for tenders is a list of other companies with contracts related to the prison, as well as the person responsible for the contract at each company. Some, like Lemay and Groupe A, are names we’ve seen before, as their contracts have been public for a long time already.

Lemay and Groupe A

Lemay and Groupe A are jointly listed as in charge of architecture for the project, with architect Pierre Larouche representing Lemay and architect Patrice Beauchemin representing Groupe A.

Mylène Carreau, a landscape architect with Lemay, represents her firm on the documents for their additional role in charge of the landscape architecture for the project.

LEMAY
3500, rue Saint-Jacques
Montréal (QC) h4c 1h2
t. (514) 932-5101
f. (514) 935-8137

Groupe A
819, avenue Moreau
Québec (QC) g1v 3b5
t. (418) 653-8341
f. (418) 653-1989

Other companies listed are new names – possibly members of a collection of firms with whom the government has what’s called a “standing offer” to work.

KJA Consultants Inc.

Engineer Louis Beauchemin, from the Montreal office of KJA Consultants Inc., features on the documents representing his elevator and escalator design company in their work on conveyor systems for the prison.

KJA CONSULTANTS INC .
1410, rue Stanley, bur. 1003
Montréal (QC) h3a 1p8
t. (514) 284-3119

BPA (Bouthillette Parizeau)

The engineering consulting firm BPA, otherwise known as Bouthillette Parizeau, will be involved in food services and commissioning for the prison. For food services, engineer Sylvie Savoie is representing the company, and for commissioning engineer Dalia Ramy appears to be in charge.

BPA
6655, boul. Pierre-Bertrand
Bureau 250
Québec (QC) g2k 1m1
t. (514) 383-3747

Stantec

Stantec, a huge design, consulting and engineering firm with an office in Longueuil, appears to be heavily involved in many aspects of the project.

For their roles related to electrical and fire alarm work, and fire protection, engineers Alexandre Manseau-Nguyen and Bruno Lehoux are in charge, respectively.
For their telecommunication work, engineer Jonathan Hallee is listed.

Stantec is also involved in many aspects of the engineering work, with the following representatives related to different subsections. Louis-Stephane Racicot’s role is as Engineering Project Manager. Engineer Alexandre Jean is in charge of mechanical, Michel Gendron in charge of electrical, Patrick Bourgeois is listed for structure, and for civil Martin Charron.

STANTEC
400-375, boul. Roland-Therrien
Longueuil (QC) j4h 4a6
t. (514) 281-1033

Work schedule and site security

While it may not be clear what specific work will be happening when, the bid documents indicate that when the construction begins, work will be occurring until 9pm maximum from Monday to Saturday, with noise-generating work happening only 7am to 6pm these days, and no work at all occurring on Sundays or statutory holidays.

There will be offices on site to securely store documents, as well as two site cameras which will be constantly livestreaming work and the site to a private website accessible to a government representative at all times.
Fences obscuring the view into the site will be erected. The documents mention that all workers will have to pass security clearance and will be prohibited from speaking to any Leclerc Detention facility prisoners (who are held just beside the site).

What to expect in the near future

It is reasonable to expect re-excavation and foundational work to begin very quickly following the awarding of the contract to the General Contractor at the end of March. This means that those opposed to the construction of yet another piece of infrastructure solely designed to bolster the government’s capacity to detain and deport migrants must be hard at work as well, as construction may start in earnest in the next month.

Companies considering involving themselves in this entirely unacceptable project, serving only to rip apart families and communities, would do well to stay far away from this project. They may risk their reputation, their clients, and their money by choosing to lend their expertise to this unambiguously racist and violent project in a moment where it is extremely important for everyone to pick a side: against white supremacy and xenophobia. Companies providing materials for the construction, or interested in being subcontracted to work in a more limited role should also think long and hard before making an unethical and indefensible choice.

For a world without prisons or borders.
For freedom of movement and freedom to live for all.

For more background information on the migrant prison project, and to download materials and research documents related to the struggle against it, visit stopponslaprison.info.

To read the documents summarized in this piece, you can download them directly from the government website using these links. We recommend using TorBrowser to avoid giving your IP address.

Migrant Prison: Excavation Company Loiselle’s Offices Redecorated

 Comments Off on Migrant Prison: Excavation Company Loiselle’s Offices Redecorated
Feb 072019
 

Anonymous submission to MTL Counter-info

According to this article in a local Salaberry-de-Valleyfield newspaper from January 29th, the building facade of the excavation company Loiselle, located at 280 Pie-XII Boulevard in Saint-Timothée, was redecorated. The words “NO TO THE MIGRANT PRISON” can be read.

The article indicates that this crime was committed with racist intentions, specifying that the company has no idea why it would have been targeted.

We do not know the intentions of the vandals, but we know that a new prison for migrants is supposed to be constructed in Laval, and that this company received the contract for decontamination and excavation for this project. Is it not the fact of imprisoning and deporting more migrants that is racist? It’s only logical that the companies involved in the construction of this prison would be targeted.

FUCK LOISELLE, FUCK THE CANADIAN BORDER SERVICES AGENCY, FUCK PRISONS.
SOLIDARITY WITH MIGRANTS WITH OR WITHOUT PAPERS

Tomorrow is far away: An anarchist intervention against the construction of the migrant prison in Laval

 Comments Off on Tomorrow is far away: An anarchist intervention against the construction of the migrant prison in Laval
Dec 172018
 

Anonymous submission to MTL Counter-info

Citizenship can only exist and be valued if there is also a category of others, those without status. For this distinction to exist, it must be enforced by the state, which has a number of tools to do so.

Deportation is one such tool. Deportation is a violent process in which the state removes all agency from an individual in order to exclude them from the territory over which it asserts its authority. To accomplish this task, the state uses different tactics, one of which is detention centers or migrant prisons. Migrant prisons are used as holding centers prior to deportation. People without status can be arrested and imprisoned while they wait to be flown out of the country, sometimes to far-away lands that they have no relationship to.

The state has been deporting more people in recent years and is currently expanding its capacity to do so. Hiring more Canadian Border Service Agency (CBSA) personnel, finding various ways to monitor undocumented folks, and building new detention centers are ways the state is increasing its ability to effectively deport people. In Laval, a city on Montreal’s north shore, the government wants to build a so-called “more humane” detention center next to a detention center that already exists. However, we all know that a golden cage is still a cage. This is a provocation, a confrontational act, an attack on undocumented folks, on our communities, on all of us. The current migrant crisis will only intensify, considering climate change, war, and widespread conflict in many countries. Migrants risk brutal rejection from the western world, which scrambles to reinforce its borders against the others, the barbarian enemy invasion. The media has recently said that the federal government wants to increase the number of annual deportations by 30%. A project of domination like the migrant prison brings the state of Canada closer to achieving its colonial mission of controlling every aspect of people’s lives and the land it is situated on. By reinforcing its own legitimacy and the category of others, the fascistic ideal of “purity” seems ever more possible.

It’s important to note that the authors of this text are white and were born in Canada. That being said, we are not threatened by deportation, or being locked up in the migrant prison. We still choose to struggle against the construction of this new prison in solidarity with those who risk their lives looking for a better life elsewhere. Not only are we against the policing of non-status people and detention centers, but our objective is also to destroy domination in all its forms, including states and borders. Even though we have the privilege of having citizenship, we are not proud Canadians. We have no feelings of belonging to the national identity. The struggle we want to build doesn’t hope to be recognized by the state or get its approval. Instead of asking the government to stop deportations, we choose to subvert our privilege. We have the ability to opt into struggle and throw a wrench into the gears of the deportation machine. Those responsible for detention should sleep with one eye open.

Intervention

We want to try to coordinate our energy in an informal and decentralized way to focus on stopping the construction of the migrant prison. If we focus on this specific struggle, it’s in order to obtain effective results. This prison is one of many tools in the state’s arsenal, an important aspect in the preservation of Canada and its borders. That being said, we are opposed to all prisons, all forms of detention, though this time we choose to focus on this particular element. We hope that others will contribute in multiplying offensive endeavors that cause tension to rise. That being said, we refuse to wait for mass participation to act. The time is now.

What can it look like to fight the state and its projects? There is no single answer to this question and no magic formula for success. However, there are certain principles that can help us make coherent choices and can prevent eventual recuperation by politicians and the Left. For us, these principles are applicable to all of our struggles. Some of them, such as the golden no snitching rule, are more obvious. But let’s dig a little deeper.

First, we refuse to make demands to the state. Making demands is often a reflex for people who struggle against specific projects. Demands put forward a narrative in which only those who exert power over others –those in positions of authority-can create change. This reflex is a negation of our own agency and our capacity to act in the world by delegating our power to politicians and bosses. We want to move away from this method of organizing and towards a struggle that can subvert power dynamics and create change without waiting for permission. We want to destroy the state, not reinforce its legitimacy.

Negotiation can also be tempting when we don’t think we have the power to create change. Liberals would want us to believe that we always have to make concessions, to give in a little. However, in a situation like this one, no alternative is acceptable. No nicer prisons, no friendlier CBSA agents, and no alternative monitoring or policing of undocumented communities should be tolerated.

An alternative to demands and negotiation is direct confrontation. We think that attacks are an integral part of preventing the construction of this migrant prison. Attacking those who want to build the prison, those who are drawing up the plans, those who are pouring the cement, those who are intending to lock people up. Forms of attacks can vary according to people’s abilities, trust, etc.

Direct confrontation does not require centralization or hierarchy. In fact, we think that it is necessary to organize in a decentralized and informal way. This means no formal identity, no membership, no orders. People should organize themselves with individuals they share affinity with, meaning ideas, practice, and trust.

Using these methods, we see a way to better adapt to contexts and the relationships between those who struggle. Informal organizing prioritizes the content rather than container. Not waiting for a party, committee, or group’s approval allows our interventions to be more effective. For trust to be established among those who struggle, a certain level of engagement is necessary. There is a difference between personal engagement and formal organizing in terms of accountability. In the first, one is accountable to their ideas, in the second, they are accountable to a formality that is bigger than them in which the organization becomes more important than relationships and individual analysis. To meet periodically in larger numbers to share information and perspectives without making centralized decisions is desirable to us. We recognize the tendency that people have to engage in a variety of struggles, without continuity, with actions that remain symbolic insofar as they have minimal impact on their targets. This kind of involvement tends to prevent expansive conflictuality. The importance of identifying and targeting those responsible (and their collaborators) for domination and detention, and to share analysis regarding medium to long term perspectives is clear. However, all of these energies must remain in motion and should not be trapped in formal organizations under the pretext of maintaining better continuity.

To create a larger context for struggle, several individuals, identifying as anarchists, revolutionaries, or other “autonomous forces”, have a tendency to fall in the trap of the masses and public opinion by organizing alongside the Left and by communicating with mass media. But at what price? It is already obvious that all reforms, as socializing as they may be, contribute to strengthening the chains that bind us to the state. We want to use our own means (zines, independent media, posters, graffiti, infrastructure that supports undocumented people) and build the basis for our struggles according to our anarchist principles that are in rupture with institutions. To subvert social dynamics and destroy domination, we refuse to follow leftist movements and organizing.

Realistically, the only way that we can stop Canada’s deportations and new prisons, its exploitation, domination, and support for the worst kinds of atrocities, its propagation of authoritarian, racist, and colonial endeavors, is to destroy the colonial project altogether. The state needs to be confronted with insurrection, the sabotage of its structures, and permanent revolt. Cracks are everywhere – let’s find them.